Resultatives in Korean Revisited: Complementation versus Adjunction

English Resultatives Revisited

This paper focusses on the English adjectival resultative construction, as exempliied in examples (1)-(4). (1) John hammered the metal at. (2) The river froze solid. (3) The dog barked itself hoarse. (4) The dog barked the neighbours awake. Result predication occurs with both transitive and intransitive verbs. In the transitive case, the result state is predicated of the object (1). For intrans...

Adjunction Structure Formalism for English -Korean Machine Translation System

In this paper, we present a knowledge representation which is focused on the correspondence of adjunction strl!cture between English and Korean. We acquire the knowledge available in machine translation, from the linguistic structures and data in the two languages. The adjunction stucture is the constituent representing the relation between the modifier and the modifiee. Our approach is based o...

Objects in Resultatives

Complementation of B Uchi Automata Revisited

As an alternative to the two classical proofs for complemen-tation of B uchi automata, due to B uchi himself and to McNaughton, we outline a third approach, based on stratiied alternating automata with a \weak" acceptance condition. Building on work by Muller, Saoudi, Schupp (1986) and Kupferman and Vardi (1997), we present a streamlined version of this complementation proof. An essential point...

The Strategy of Korean Multinational Enterprises – Multiple versus Single plant

Using firm-level panel data for Korean MNEs, we make a distinction between being the only affiliate of a parent firm and being the one of the multiple affiliates of a parent firm. Comparisons of correlations between purchases and sales of each group of the foreign affiliates show distinctive difference in the motivations of FDI and the multinational activities, due to the difference in the numb...